In Tucson, Arizona’s SB1070 Not So Popular

cactus“We call them Maricopa Morons,” said Charlie about the conservative county to the north, as he sat on a bench on 4th Avenue, smoking away a Saturday afternoon.

Polls say a plurality of Arizonans support the passage of SB1070, Arizona’s racial-profiling law, but I didn’t find them during a recent long weekend in Tucson. Instead, I found the other Arizona. Frank Stockton was typical, “I don’t know what they’re up to up there [at the state capital.] Mexico has always been a pretty good friend to Arizona.”

Tucson is the closest city to the big border town of Nogales Arizona, the other half of which is Nogales, Mexico. The location is right in the path of illegal workers coming to the US, a group that has been declining since 2008.

The day before I arrived, on May 5, 7,000 protesters had gathered to oppose the new law. Just a day later, life in Tucson seemed to be going on pretty much as usual. That shouldn’t be a surprise. Traditionally, Tucson has always been more activist about music than about government. (Just today, however, Erykah Badu and Cypress Hill cancelled planned concerts over the issue.)

Maybe it was because the half Mexican-American city was used to political grandstanding from up north. Or maybe it was because local sheriff, Clarence Dupnik, had already said he didn’t intend to enforce the law. But Lyn Southerland told me that “Cinco de Mayo crowds” had been “smaller around town,” which she attributed to the chilling effect of the new law.

There were afternoon protests by students at Tucson high schools. But the kids were protesting the other nutty idea — ending Tucson’s successful Mexican-American cultural education programs. That idea has since become law too.

When you ask Tucsonans what they think about SB1070, they know the law by number, and they all seem to have an opinion. Only one person said he didn’t really know anything about it, but he seemed to be drunk. Tina, a bartender at Che’s Lounge (maybe she was responsible for the guy who knew nothing) expressed the most common sentiment, “That’s the dumbest shit law I ever heard of,” she said.

Enrique Alcantar, a Tucson chef, lamented the idea of Arizona Congressman Raul Grijalva’s would call for boycotts, “I don’t support the law, but calling for boycotts of his own state? Who does he think the boycott is gonna hurt. It’ll be the same people people targeted by the law.”

That said, the boycott seems to be working. The Arizona Republic reports that Phoenix alone may lose $90 million in convention and visitor revenue. According to Tucson Weekly, Tucson took a $6 million hit in just the week after the law was signed. Alcantar is right — the food, beverage and hospitality industries are poised to be hard hit by the boycott. Conventions are booked years in advance. The damage will linger years after the law is overturned or repealed.

Phoenix mayor Phil Gordon calls it “an economic crisis.” And it is worth noting that Tucson, Phoenix and Flagstaff – three of Arizona’s biggest cities – are all suing to have the law overturned.

Predictably, Governor Jan Brewer remained stunningly tone deaf. In announcing a task force to blunt the momentum of the boycott, she noted that tourists shouldn’t boycott Arizona. After all, as she put it, “For those people flying in, they already have that identification, most of them, when they get on the plane.”

No kidding. She really said that.

Also on Technorati

ΩΩΩ

About Jimmy Zuma

Jimmy Zuma is America's Favorite Liberal
This entry was posted in Arizona, Election, SB1070 and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to In Tucson, Arizona’s SB1070 Not So Popular

  1. Benito says:

    I hope that every American, regardless of where he lives, will stop and examine his conscience about this and other related incidents. This Nation was founded by men of many nations and backgrounds. It was founded on the principle that all men are created equal, and that the rights of every man are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened. All of us ought to have the right to be treated as he would wish to be treated, as one would wish his children to be treated, but this is not the case.

    I know the proponents of this law say that the majority approves of this law, but the majority is not always right. Would women or non-whites have the vote if we listen to the majority of the day, would the non-whites have equal rights (and equal access to churches, housing, restaurants, hotels, retail stores, schools, colleges and yes water fountains) if we listen to the majority of the day? We all know the answer, a resounding, NO!

    Today we are committed to a worldwide struggle to promote and protect the rights of all who wish to be free. In a time of domestic crisis men of good will and generosity should be able to unite regardless of party or politics and do what is right, not what is just popular with the majority. Some men comprehend discrimination by never have experiencing it in their lives, but the majority will only understand after it happens to them.

  2. Wow this is a great resource.. I’m enjoying it.. good article

  3. I got my voice heard on the Arizona Immigration Law SB 1070 at http://www.azimmigrationrights.org and I’m glad I did.

  4. I can’t wait to see what new Arizona state law will be passed next!

  5. Pingback: An oasis of brilliance in Arizona's desert full of crazy | Smart v. Stupid

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>