http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3z587_i5pqU

Here’s a sample from the narration:

Greed had displaced the golden rule.
Compassion and morals were thought traits of a fool.

And if truth or fair play ever got in their way,
the greedy agreed they’re a fair price to pay.

The greedy controlled news on the air,
pretending reports were balanced and fair.

Faking righteous anger, using code words for race,
frauds were thought fair if they had a fair face.

With relentless repeating, the myths took hold.
Pumping family values, pundits sold gold.

or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19jXxSeH2oQ&feature=youtu.be

two sincere question for progressives or liberals:

1- If you are a democrat and or a true progressive would you vote for someone that would -
– restore the democratically elected republic & end the empire spending saving about $500 billion every year and 1 trillion at least every two years (DHS police state budgets, even more savings), while ensuring our Bill of Rights, eliminating corporate welfare (hundreds of billions), ending the drug war (billions), reducing the debt by lowering the interest paid making your dollar worth more, legalizing hemp, making a more hospitipal environment for entreprenuers and starts ups, making sure alternative medicine and voices are protected, allowing prescription drugs to be imported, having a strong defence and making more friends with the world by leading from example, having a transparent, open and accountable government that also protects whiste blowers and audits not just the Federal Reserve but makes no agency above the law, and opening dialougue and debate with sincerity and honesty while not having to realistically worry about Education and Social Security and other social safety nets because that is mostly up to our Congress and is just a bunch of fear hype – but everything else mentioned would come to pass – would you then vote for Ron Paul? – if the most libertarian idea he proposes is if someone wants to excercise their right to opt out, that, that would be recogznized, and they wont go to prison for it and have their property seized and even that would also need to pass Congress and is now more a philosphical debate although you may come to think it makes sense and that we actually have solved this puzzle because maybe if all the above things were corrected it wouldnt be such a big issue anyways (and we could have the best from the so called left and right and not the worst). Do you think that 4 years of that with maybe lets say Jesse Ventura as Vice President (which would erase the age issue) might be a good vote this 2012?

2- or would you rather vote for someone that tells you what you think you want to hear but breaks almost every promise and never delivers on hardly any of it? like corporate bailouts (both parties) to Wall Street (the money could have been directed to the people to trickle up and saved both the people and the banks but instead trickled only to the connected institutions) and the Health Care & Military Industrial Complex and private mercenaries, and to secret private intelligence agencies and others that have the money, empire spending, empire wars, supporting the patriot act and other laws that contradict the Bill of Rights and 4th amendment and executive signing statements, indefinate detention etc & keeping the status quo on the drug war and hemp and being surrounded by lobbyists in your own administration?

[Keep in mind even without an income tax we would be able to have a government the size of the 2000 fiscal year so dont give me the driving on public roads analogy please, and that would also cover the costs of defence etc., and actually having a voluntary tax or fee for services you may see more people signing up, I would pay into a public castostrophic insurance that was voluntary and saved money from not having to advertise etc, & with a deductible to cut out fraud and keep prices reasonable; anyways that's nothing to lose sleep on because those debates would most likely be after Ron Pauls 4 or 8 years when doing all that I mentioned above first we would be in the beginning of a new Renaissance, anyone who actually is worried about that needs to consider what a President can actually do and not do and what the real issues are and the issues that Ron Paul can really affect are ones you may consider voting on -]

I’m looking forward to the GOP becoming a viable alternative to the Democratic Party, but for the time being, it is a political cartoon and no more.